Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 01 , Clapman, P. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2 3 , Coffee, J. Combs, J. Journal of Management Studies, 44 8 , Cunat, V. Say Pays! Shareholder Voice and Firm Performance. Review of Finance, 20 5 , Cziraki, P. European Financial Management, 16 5 , Davis, G.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 1 , Del Guercio, D. Detthamrong, U. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, Eisdorfer, A. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, Ertimur, Y. The Review of Financial Studies, 24 2 , Filatotchev, I. Journal of Management and Governance, 19, Florackis, C. Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: evidence for UK firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 4 1 , Freeman, R. Organization Science, 15 3 , Gantchev, N.
Journal of Financial Economics, 3 , Gillan, S. Journal of Financial Economics, 57 2 , Goranova, M. Journal of Management, 40 5 , Grewal, J. Guizani, M. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5 23 , Hsu, W. Jensen, M. The Journal of Finance, 48 3 , Jiang, W. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24 8 , Jones, T. Academy of Management Review, 20 2 , Lafarre, A. European Corporate Governance Institute. Lee, D. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15 4 , Mallin, C.
Journal of Management and Governance, 16 2 , Narwal, K. Neubaum, D. Journal of Management, 32 1 , Obermann, J. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, Othman, S. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, , Parthiban, D. Academy of Management Journal, 44 1 , Strategic Management Journal, 28 1 , Pasquali, V.
Global Finance. Piesse, J. Proffitt, W. Strategic Organization, 4 2 , Ragas, M. Agenda building during activist shareholder campaigns. Public Relations Review, 39 3 , Reid, E. Strategic Management Journal, 30 11 , Rubach, M. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21 2 , Santiago-Castro, M. Ownership structure and minority rights: A Latin American view. Journal of Economics and Business, 59 5 , Sharfman, B.
Tennessee Law Review, 82, Singh, S. Start this free course now. Just create an account and sign in. Enrol and complete the course for a free statement of participation or digital badge if available. Shareholder investor activism can also force better corporate governance. Historically, individual shareholders, whether institutions or private persons, have had little chance of influencing the board or management given the fragmentation of ownership. Shareholders can ask questions at the annual general meeting, but they would need a majority of votes in order to pass a motion that was binding on management.
Even institutional shareholders do not, in most countries, hold as much as 5 per cent of the ordinary shares of one company. However, it should be noted that in Germany there are cases, such as Daimler and Volkswagen, where single institutions hold much larger proportions.
In fact, the majority of shares in multinationals in Europe are held by financial institutions rather than private individuals. In the past such investors have preferred to sell their shares when they disagree with company policy, rather than intervene in the management of the company. However, attitudes have changed over time. Institutional investors have become more aggressive, and individual investors have formed associations that enable them to work together and command more votes in investee companies.
It started its corporate governance reform programme as early as It has a website, and its annual Focus List is a hit list of companies that need, in the view of the fund, to improve their performance. It is one of the few funds to make its proxy votes public, publishing them on its website in advance of company annual meetings. There is a growing demand that institutional investors disclose how they vote.
CalPERS' trustees its member board of administration in approved proxy voting guidelines that included voting against any director who approved non-audit work by the company's auditors. This resulted in CalPERS voting against all of the directors in the roughly companies in which it owned shares Brewster, It has become increasingly active, and publishes position papers and advice to institutional shareholders as to what standards they should expect from multinational companies in which they invest.
Some pension funds ask the board of directors of a company in which they are planning to invest to sign a document that sets out minimum governance undertakings. It was founded in Its members are institutional investors such as major pension funds like CalPERS, investment clubs and insurers, as well as leading corporate governance and shareholder value professionals, and corporate officials.
ICGN seeks to develop a global consensus on capital market corporate governance and, above all, to lay down best practice for both issuers and investors. It promotes best practice through its studies, toolkits, annual meetings and awards programme.
Share voting is a primary governance mechanism, and this study reveals that accountability is far from assured. ICGN is campaigning for the one share, one vote principle. Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. Take a look at all Open University courses. If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications.
You could either choose to start with an Access module , or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification.
0コメント