And though his work has been somewhat eclipsed by Albert Einstein, both in the field of gravity and in the popular imagination, his work is still critical to even the most trivial engineering projects, as well as the most audacious. Newton's Laws of Motion are famous for their definition of inertia, and the well-known rule that every action will have an equal and opposite reaction. But more than anything, it's the math behind it all that makes Newton's work so revolutionary — and the law everyone tends to skip over is all about the math of motion.
Briefly, the first law states that when an object is at rest, you need to overcome its inertia in order to accelerate it. Likewise, when you want to stop an object in motion or steer it in another direction, you also need to overcome that object's inertia to slow it down to a resting state.
This is pretty intuitive for most people. If you are in a speeding car and you suddenly try to make a turn without decelerating, your car is probably going to shift over to the next lane, and you're going to miss your turn completely because you failed to overcome the car's inertia. Likewise, it gets easier to make that turn when the car's speed is much less because the car's inertia is lower - somewhere between the inertia of the speeding car and one that is parked.
Finally, you cannot turn a parked car at all, not without applying force from the engine or a push to overcome the parked car's inertia, which keeps it in place. Newton's Third Law, briefly, means that if an airplane is taking off, the weight of the plane pushes the wings of the plane down because of gravity.
The air rushing beneath the wings, on the other hand, pushes up against the bottom of the wing, which generates lift. There are countless other examples like this that you can find, but the one thing they will all have in common is that the math that governs the behavior and outcome of all of these interactions can be found in the Second Law of Motion. Newton's Second Law of Motion is that an object's acceleration depends on the mass of the object and the force applied.
Sounds simple enough, but there's a lot more to it. First, we'll need to define a few terms for this to make sense. The first is velocity , which is a measure of how fast an object is moving at a given time. The validity of the second law is completely based on experimental verification. When an object is dropped, it accelerates toward the center of Earth. If air resistance is negligible, the net force on a falling object is the gravitational force, commonly called its weight w.
Weight can be denoted as a vector w because it has a direction; down is, by definition, the direction of gravity, and hence weight is a downward force. The magnitude of weight is denoted as w. Galileo was instrumental in showing that, in the absence of air resistance, all objects fall with the same acceleration g. Consider an object with mass m falling downward toward Earth. It experiences only the downward force of gravity, which has magnitude w.
When the net external force on an object is its weight, we say that it is in free-fall. That is, the only force acting on the object is the force of gravity. In the real world, when objects fall downward toward Earth, they are never truly in free-fall because there is always some upward force from the air acting on the object. The acceleration due to gravity g varies slightly over the surface of Earth, so that the weight of an object depends on location and is not an intrinsic property of the object.
On the Moon, for example, the acceleration due to gravity is only 1. The broadest definition of weight in this sense is that the weight of an object is the gravitational force on it from the nearest large body , such as Earth, the Moon, the Sun, and so on. This is the most common and useful definition of weight in physics.
It differs dramatically, however, from the definition of weight used by NASA and the popular media in relation to space travel and exploration. We shall use the above definition of weight, and we will make careful distinctions between free-fall and actual weightlessness. It is important to be aware that weight and mass are very different physical quantities, although they are closely related. It is tempting to equate the two, since most of our examples take place on Earth, where the weight of an object only varies a little with the location of the object.
Which statement is correct? Explain your answer and give an example. Describe a situation in which the net external force on a system is not zero, yet its speed remains constant. A system can have a nonzero velocity while the net external force on it is zero. Describe such a situation. A rock is thrown straight up. What is the net external force acting on the rock when it is at the top of its trajectory?
State it in words and as an equation. If the acceleration of a system is zero, are no external forces acting on it? What about internal forces? Explain your answers. If a constant, nonzero force is applied to an object, what can you say about the velocity and acceleration of the object? The gravitational force on the basketball in Figure 2 is ignored. When gravity is taken into account, what is the direction of the net external force on the basketball—above horizontal, below horizontal, or still horizontal?
You may assume data taken from illustrations is accurate to three digits. What is the net external force on him? If the sprinter from the previous problem accelerates at that rate for 20 m, and then maintains that velocity for the remainder of the m dash, what will be his time for the race? A cleaner pushes a 4. Calculate the magnitude of its acceleration. In Figure 3, the net external force on the kg mower is stated to be 51 N.
If the force of friction opposing the motion is 24 N, what force F in newtons is the person exerting on the mower? Suppose the mower is moving at 1. How far will the mower go before stopping? What force is necessary to produce this deceleration? Assume that the rockets are off. The mass of the system is kg.
Assume that the mass of the system is kg, the thrust T is 2. What is the deceleration of the rocket sled if it comes to rest in 1. Sir Isaac Newton worked in many areas of mathematics and physics. He developed the theories of gravitation in when he was only 23 years old. By developing his three laws of motion, Newton revolutionized science.
This tendency to resist changes in a state of motion is inertia. There is no net force acting on an object if all the external forces cancel each other out. Then the object will maintain a constant velocity. If that velocity is zero, then the object remains at rest. If an external force acts on an object, the velocity will change because of the force.
His second law defines a force to be equal to change in momentum mass times velocity per change in time. Momentum is defined to be the mass m of an object times its velocity V. The airplane has a mass m0 and travels at velocity V0. The mass and velocity of the airplane change during the flight to values m1 and V1. Let us assume that the mass stays a constant value equal to m. The weight of the fuel is probably small relative to the weight of the rest of the airplane, especially if we only look at small changes in time.
0コメント